DETROIT -- The Detroit Red Wings are on a three-game winning streak and the San Jose Sharks are fresh off of being stunned by the team that beat them in the Stanley Cup Final last season.The teams are scheduled to play at 7 p.m. Saturday at Joe Louis Arena. Both are 3-2-0.After losing its first two games of the season, Detroit has reeled off three consecutive wins, the latest a 5-3 decision over the Nashville Predators Friday night at Joe Louis.In that game, two players who have to produce a lot of offense for the Red Wings to be successful scored their first goals of the season.Right winger Gustav Nyquist had a goal and an assist and left winger Tomas Tatar had a goal.Tatars goal, 1:10 into the third period, broke a tie and put Detroit ahead for good and Nyquist scored later in the period to make it 4-2.Im just worried about one game at a time and Im worried about getting better every day and I thought we took a step in getting better today, Red Wings coach Jeff Blashill said after Friday nights game. I thought we did a real good job of spending time in their end. We did a real good job of winning puck battles. We did a real good job of reloading hard and getting back above people and when we do that, were a real good team.I thought we transitioned well, I thought a lot of guys were playing. I thought we took a step forward. Now we got to take another step forward tomorrow.Veteran fourth line left winger Drew Miller scored his second goal in two games Friday.We definitely had some times in the first couple of games here where we didnt play the way we wanted to play, Miller said. Were cleaning that up and trying to play a 60-minute game. I think thats the biggest thing, just moving forward and finding the positives and continuing to build off of those.Defenseman Ryan Sproul made his season debut for Detroit and had an assist on Justin Abdelkaders power-play goal in the second period. In his second NHL game, Sproul was even in 14:57 of ice time.San Jose, which closes out a five-game road trip Saturday, lost 3-2 on the road to the Pittsburgh Penguins Thursday night after leading 2-0 going into the third period.It was the first time under coach Pete DeBoer that the Sharks had lost in regulation time when they held a lead after two periods. They were 28-0-2 in the 2015-16 regular season, and 9-0 in the playoffs, when leading after 40 minutes.The biggest thing is we were playing for a 4-1 record going into that third, captain Joe Pavelski said. Not because it was the Penguins. Its early in the year. Its not easy to start coming on the road with all of these games. Now were staring at 3-2 and we move on. Discount Hydro Flask .ca NFL Power Rankings, overtaking the Denver Broncos and remaining ahead of NFC competition San Francisco, Carolina and New Orleans. Hydro Flask Sale . "Were just throwing s--- at the wall hoping something sticks," said Tortorella about the possible line combinations for Fridays game against Columbus. The Canucks have lost five straight games and six of their last seven, leaving them in a logjam in the Pacific Division, currently sitting fifth - good for ninth in the Western Conference. http://www.discounthydroflaskcheap.com/ . - The Oakland Raiders re-signed offensive lineman Khalif Barnes on Friday. Discount Hydro Flask Cheap . Its sharpness matched my mind. This was no night to go to sleep. Cheap Hydro Flask For Sale . Numbers Game looks into the Canadiens securing the services of Thomas Vanek in a trade with the New York Islanders. The Canadiens Get: LW Thomas Vanek and a conditional fifth-round pick. The BCCI has called for a Special General Meeting (SGM) on October 15 in Delhi to discuss the interim order passed by the Supreme Court last week. The order had given the board and state associations to respond by October 17 whether they would unconditionally comply with the Lodha Committees recommendations.This weeks SGM is the second such emergent meeting called by the BCCI in the last two weeks. At the last SGM, on October 1, the BCCI had decided to conditionally adopt some of the recommendations which further infuriated the court.Consequently, the three-judge bench of the Supreme Court alerted the BCCI not to precipitate matters during the hearing last Friday. The court also asked the board to stop issuing funds to errant state associations which did not implement the recommendations.Despite the pressing directive and the urgency sought from the court, both BCCI as well as most states associations continued to remain stoic and unaffected. Incidentally, the boards notice on the SGM only reached the state associations on Monday. Also, president Anurag Thakur and secretary Ajay Shirke are currently in Cape Town attending ICC meetings from October 10 to 14.Officials at both BCCI and state associations ESPNcricinfo spoke to pointed out that certain discrepancies between the July 18 court order passed by the court and the Lodha Committee report that was released on January 4. The board is likely to point out the same during the next hearing on October 17 when the court reconvenes after the Dussehra holidays.One legal loophole, Shirke pointed out, was whereas earlier in the Lodha report state associations were given one year, the July 18 court order prescribed a maximum of six months to implement the recommendations. Shirke said it only created confusion. The legal difficulties are that the committee has given the state associations one year, Shirke told the Sunday Express. Now suddenly, they have made it deadline-bound. Has the one-year deadline been withdrawn by the SC? We dont know. It hasnt been informed. Now, todays order of the Supreme Court says, as we didnt submit the affidavit, they had to stop the money. In light of all this, theres confusion.In the Lodha report, referring to grounds for sanction and derecognition of a member, the committee had said: No Member shall be entitled to any grant from the BCCI if its Constitution fails to provide for, or comply with the following within One Year after the Effective Date. The following was essentially the new governance structure suggested by the committee for which the states wouldd first need to amend their constitution.ddddddddddddowever, a basic reading of the court order makes it clear the court had designated the Lodha Committee to oversee and direct the implementation of the recommendations at both BCCI and state level within a reasonable period ranging between four and six months from the July 18 order. So far, only two official Full Members, Vidarbha Cricket Association and Tripura Cricket Association, have adopted the recommendations unanimously. Rajasthan Cricket Association, which is not recognised by BCCI since it elected Lalit Modi (banned by BCCI) as its president, was the first to adopt the recommendations. However, most of bigger state associations remain defiant.A former BCCI office bearer, who is currently head of a state association, was irritated when asked if he was bothered by the last weeks court directive which asked the BCCI to stop issuing funds to the states. There is no difficulty we - states - face, he said. Lodha Committee has given a particular recommendation about the states. In the Supreme Court judgement, para 61, the court has said it accepts the rights of a citizens under Article 19 (1) (c) to form an association and the court will not interfere.The official pointed out that the court had said the BCCI could not be granted the same immunity under Article 19(1) (c) since it is a private body performing a public function. The court has now asked BCCI to stop giving funds to state associations that do not comply with the recommendations set by the Lodha Committee. But if I dont (comply) nobody can touch me. The board will not pay me money, but that money can only be boards money. If the money belongs to the states, the court cannot stop us.The official said that if his state association were to host an international match, he has the right to get the money that the BCCI earns from the broadcasting rights. We are holding the match. BCCI is only negotiating on our behalf.A senior lawyer, who is well conversant with the BCCI constitution, said the state association president had misread and misinterpreted the clause. The lawyer pointed out he had heard the same reasoning being given by more than one state association. Everyone has a right to freedom of association under Article 19 (1) (c), but once you have associated the court has said nothing stops it from regulating you (the state association) after you carry out a public function, the lawyer said. ' ' '